Big4dating com Xxx text dating montreal
But on a very rudimentary level - the lawyers will examine the fact pattern before discovering and confirming the facts and see if it's even worth pursuing, defending, etc.The very basic fact pattern is that the employee was fired because someone assaulted him on grounds that likely had security in place.
I am sure that HR and partner ALREADY had a card to play, let alone my state is at-will state. But then, I am a mere bottom low in the chain so what do I know. Why don't you claim that everyone can't preach unless you are a professor?The guy below you have no knowledge of torts and criminal cases.u/Valkmir, I will have the "obligatory" disclosure on your absurd statement.That's not to say the lawsuit would WIN - which is what everyone here seems to get off on arguing about - Everyone seems to want to jump into this conversation and have this almost "8 year old kid super hero battle" where we run through tons and tons of hypothetical situations to win or lose.The fact is, some very basic legal concepts would open the door to a lawsuit.
An environment/hell, in which the term 'work-life balance' is used to convince bright, young professionals to accept jobs. They will continue to use it as a topic of positive discussion for the future (always in the future).